tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23119200.post7376337363094849598..comments2023-06-19T02:59:37.569-05:00Comments on Future Priests of the Third Millennium: More on Science IIIAnthonyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15654872412419989338noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23119200.post-63048524502248684772008-04-30T17:40:00.000-05:002008-04-30T17:40:00.000-05:00Good summary. Even and fair. The concern for mor...Good summary. Even and fair. <BR/><BR/>The concern for moral grounds is being advanced from within science itself in concepts of shared moral intuitions. Levin’s concern would be whether these grounds are strong enough. I think your concern is whether biologized grounds are proper. Alone. <BR/><BR/>I agree with you on something like an innate conscience. <BR/><BR/>My quasi-Quaker bias (plus a bunch of other influences) would credit the Inner Light for any heightened capacity for advanced discernment of good and evil in concrete cases, case by case. <BR/><BR/>I sincerely appreciated your very keen and kind balance of submitting to the Cross while simultaneously crediting Levin’s voice as “one to which men of good will should listen.” Very nice job. <BR/><BR/>I don’t have the answer on how to bridge the two: Cross and science. My knowledge is too partial. Scaffolded. Messy. <BR/><BR/>But, I do hope that your kind of spirit will punctuate the work of the future priests of the third millennium. Best wishes in your studies and service.<BR/><BR/>Cheers,<BR/><BR/>JimJRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07674489078935633842noreply@blogger.com